2 ms·
Your post seems to imply that end to end encryption is bad and that we need a surveillance state run either by corporations or government in order to protect ch
by mlindner 5y ago
Your post seems to imply that end to end encryption is bad and that we need a surveillance state run either by corporations or government in order to protect children.
We need to not head down this path.
Protecting children has always historically been led by their own parents and we should empower that. Improvements should always be about parental education (teaching parents to recognize the signs of abuse/grooming before abuse) and cultural education (teaching about the harms of sexual abuse so that potential offenders don't act). Contrary to popular belief, most pedophiles are not actually psychopaths and actually have consciences and if they see the damage that their actions could cause, they're less likely to act and more likely to find non-damaging outlets for their urges (simulated or drawn material, as two examples).
- ALittleLight 5y agoFacebook reports ~20 million instances of child sexual abuse materials a year. My understanding is that this material is largely transmitted by message (i.e. people aren't posting it on their wall, but sharing it in chat). Regardless of your ideological convictions, the fact remains that one trade off of end to end encryption is a reduction in ability to detect, track, and report CSAM. My intuition is that our current trajectory will lead us to a "worst of all worlds" case where governments continue to spy on and suppress people by subverting end to end encryption at some level, but pedophiles will trade their material with impunity. Ideally, I would like to find the opposite compromise, where we could detect and catch criminals while maintaining privacy. This has been attempted by law, due process, warrants, and such - but that attempt is subverted by the government not following the law.
- Craighead 5y agoWhy do we allow fake corporate sponsored content like yours on HN?
- mlindner 5y agoThey don't actually describe what kind of content this is nor whether there's false positive in those reports to my knowledge. I wonder how many parents posting "babies first bath" type photos get accidentally labeled. Then there's the question whether they're labeling adult anime photos as child abuse imagery which could also greatly inflate the numbers. 20 million sounds like a ridiculously unrealistic high number. There just isn't that much of that type of content out there. A reasonable number would be in the 10s of thousands I would think.
- HNdev1995 5y ago20 million a year globally? That seems likely to me. These aren't unique instances.