3 ms·
> The message of an artistic bridge should be Why should it be that? Why's that the only approved message in your mind? > The message here is "we pooped a bri
by chrisseaton 5y ago
> The message of an artistic bridge should be
Why should it be that? Why's that the only approved message in your mind?
> The message here is "we pooped a bridge!"
You're just being abusive.
- Grakel 5y agoYou said there's never any reason for art. That's not just abusive, it's wrong. Without a reason, it's not art. And the reason here is weak. It's "because we could." That's what makes this objectively bad.
- chrisseaton 5y agoYou’re confusing reason as in technical requirement with reason as in why they chose to do something. They can choose to do something without it being a requirement. And you’re changing your comments after they’ve been replied to - please don’t do that.
- Grakel 5y agoI'm not confused at all. You're constructing a very unusual meaning of "reason" in your first reply in order to...? I was editing while you replied, I had not read your reply when I hit submit.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]