4 ms·
> I disagree, I think it is. I don't see what right of anyone is infringed by my exercise of speech. Go threaten to murder someone in front of a police offer a
by CarelessExpert 5y ago
> I disagree, I think it is. I don't see what right of anyone is infringed by my exercise of speech.
Go threaten to murder someone in front of a police offer and then see if your theory holds.
- zohch 5y agoThis is a link to the full speech: https://youtu.be/O613tUE2X3o?t=630 https://youtu.be/O613tUE2X3o?t=630 The video is her speaking about what limitations on political speech is appropriate for Facebook to impose. Facebook is not a government, Facebook is not in a position to make things like violent threats or incitement legal, even if they wanted to. This is about what legal speech should be allowed on Facebook.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- CarelessExpert 5y agoThank you! I watched the video. Frankly, I disagree with your interpretation of her statements. Free speech is a right that must be balanced against other rights. That's all she says. If you disagree with that, you believe in a type of free speech absolutism that has never existed in the real world.