> What I don't understand is why people are using git for this kind of workflow. People like to use distributed workflows even with monorepos. E.g. chains of c

> What I don't understand is why people are using git for this kind of workflow. People like to use distributed workflows even with monorepos. E.g. chains of commits, branches, rewriting local history, etc. It's clear that people want a mixture of monorepos with distributed workflows. There are two ways to get there: add distributed flows to a monorepos, or build a monorepo layer over a distributed tool. Both seem like valid approaches. The market will decide which approach it prefers.