3 ms·
Succinct, obtuse, self-pitying and dissembling. Probably a Gawker writer. If one goes around committing tortious invasion of privacy and infliction of emotiona
by linksnapzz 5y ago
Succinct, obtuse, self-pitying and dissembling. Probably a Gawker writer.
If one goes around committing tortious invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress, one will get sued for it eventually, and possibly lose in court.
Yes, even if you call yourself a "journalist" while doing so. Yes, even if your targets for abuse are icky-poo wrongthinkers like Thiel and Bollea, who shouldn't have access to legal remedies because darn it, they have declasse opinions contra to the "speak truth to power" crowd.
Getting sued is getting off easy, and deep down Denton & co. knew that losing in court was the worst thing that could happen to them-it wasn't like they embarrassed John Gotti or Chapo Guzman, or someone else whose retaliation would involve semtex and garrottes.
- CPLX 5y agoYes you’re correct, being crushed by the unjust power of wealth is mildly superior to being bombed or strangled by serial murderers and career criminals. Insightful, that.
- linksnapzz 5y agoHad Gawker been sued into oblivion by one of the many, many non-wealthy that they humiliated for the lulz, would you be less upset? Or are you staking out a pro-libel position in general?
- CPLX 5y agoThat scenario is not plausible. Which precisely illustrates the original point.