2 ms·
> Carbon dioxide is good for trees. Literally the first hit on Google for this phrase is exactly about this [1]. [1] https://theconversation.com/yes-more-carb
by titzer 5y ago
> Carbon dioxide is good for trees.
Literally the first hit on Google for this phrase is exactly about this [1].
[1] https://theconversation.com/yes-more-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-helps-plants-grow-but-its-no-excuse-to-downplay-climate-change-130603 https://theconversation.com/yes-more-carbon-dioxide-in-the-a...
You're repeating easily debunked denialist talking points and claiming insight when people have studied this problem for decades and discovered that no, on balance, abrupt changes in CO2 are not good for our biosphere.
- redpiller 5y agoEvery single point in that article reinforces my point... Aside from some hand-wavy warnings which try to appeal to people's emotions that it's not a reason to be complacent. I don't know how you can read that article and come up with the conclusion that it's 'debunked denialist talking points' - That is 100% emotional appeal. There is no logic behind it. There are financial incentives on both sides. At the end of the day, you have to look at the facts.