I mean, I feel like as a proponent of free speech, I can stand by a paper's right to publish bad (even dangerous) takes, but I have trouble defending Gawker's r

I mean, I feel like as a proponent of free speech, I can stand by a paper's right to publish bad (even dangerous) takes, but I have trouble defending Gawker's right to publish a sex tape of a non-notable college student as free speech.