3 ms·
The thing is, they're still responsible for cutting down the Amazon. The "responding to demand" is a complete cop-out. Stop blaming the consumer for the action
by Valmar 5y ago
The thing is, they're still responsible for cutting down the Amazon.
The "responding to demand" is a complete cop-out. Stop blaming the consumer for the actions of the greedy.
I wouldn't be surprised if the consumer very often isn't even aware of the sources of the materials for a lot of the stuff they buy. And it doesn't help that the consumer is all too often worried about stuff that immediately affects them, leaving them no time or energy to worry about stuff that's they're not immediately aware of.
It's like blaming the consumer for the ridiculous amount of plastic corporations use for packaging when that's all that's available 99% of the time.
- ratww 5y ago> It's like blaming the consumer for the ridiculous amount of plastic corporations use for packaging when that's all that's available 99% of the time. Oh, that's a huge pet peeve of mine. In some places I lived it was impossible to buy produce without plastic bags because the stores force you to use their own bags. Also you have to put different vegetables on different bags. Otherwise you can't buy. Sure one can argue that I could just boycott all the supermarkets in my city, but those people forget that I also have to fucking eat.
- danparsonson 5y agoI didn't say they're not responsible too; my point is that none of us needs cheap beef or hardwood or gold (do we?) and it's widely known what these companies are doing, so we can't just shrug our shoulders and say "we didn't cut down the forest". Agree about the plastic though, that stuff is almost impossible to avoid.