Here are more detailed statistics that were used as the source for this article: https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/number-of-people-who-tested-positive-increases-six

Here are more detailed statistics that were used as the source for this article: https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/number-of-people-who-tested-positive-increases-sixfold https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/number-of-people-who-tested-posi... See breakdowns per age group and infection location. The distribution of vaccinations per age group is here: https://www.rivm.nl/en/covid-19-vaccination/figures-vaccination-programme https://www.rivm.nl/en/covid-19-vaccination/figures-vaccinat... Which shows that the proportion of vaccinated youngsters (who dominate in recent infections) is more or less in line with other age groups. By aligning those numbers with total amount of people in specific age group, one could tell the impact of vaccine for (not) getting ill At a quick glance (excluding behavioral contexts, which are more difficult to measure) it seems obvious that having no vaccination substantially increases the chance of getting ill. Which is not really the news, as pharmas already published such information after their own tests. The difference now is that these are official and substantial numbers to draw an independent conclusion. So, theoretically any anivaxxer who understands the statistics, should be easy to be persuaded