A disingenuous article where the author tries to push his agenda of not banning critical race theory by tying it with an article that he said a publisher didn’t

A disingenuous article where the author tries to push his agenda of not banning critical race theory by tying it with an article that he said a publisher didn’t want published. The issue is that critical race theory shouldn’t be banned but it itself pushes the silencing of other voices. Why not stand for the more general notion of not banning voices, of independent thought, and of trying to discover truth?