3 ms·
> Sadly the major brunt of such a disaster would affect farmers in regions of the US that believes the least in fighting against climate change While having an
by saurik 5y ago
> Sadly the major brunt of such a disaster would affect farmers in regions of the US that believes the least in fighting against climate change
While having anyone affected is sad, if we are going to qualify the sadness, isn't this the least sad outcome? I would be much more sad if the farmers in regions that cared the most about fighting against climate change were the ones first affected.
- HWR_14 5y agoI think the "sadly" there is supposed to be the other way around. That is supposed to be "sadly, the farmers affected believe the least in fighting climate change."
- vegetablepotpie 5y agoI’m sorry, what? I feel like that’s a normal human thing to say. People usually say it’s sad when people are affected by bad things, and don’t put a great deal of thought into every implication of how they phrase things. I don’t know, maybe you’re more a fan of karmic justice than of sad irony.
- bcrosby95 5y agoClimate change increasingly affecting people denying climate change makes it more likely they will one day accept it. I don't know how true that is, but that's my view on this particular line of thought.
- loopz 5y agoKarma is believed to work across lifetimes. Without it we'd not be free to make mistakes. So is more about reincarnation, and not about revenge, justice systems or retribution. Misguided belief in karma may wither away at sense of necessary fairness (dharma), which is also karma.
- mc32 5y agoExcept that affects everyone who depends on wheat.