>Seems like much ado about nothing unless SpaceX is outright lying Well, the article does sort of accuse them of that, right after the part you quote: > But t

>Seems like much ado about nothing unless SpaceX is outright lying Well, the article does sort of accuse them of that, right after the part you quote: > But the agency said description in documents "indicates otherwise." > The FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. "Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy," the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.