3 ms·
I don't think false centrism or compromise for the sake of compromise is beneficial here. Let's take the most clear example. Who legitimately won the 2020 US
by landryraccoon 5y ago
I don't think false centrism or compromise for the sake of compromise is beneficial here.
Let's take the most clear example.
Who legitimately won the 2020 US Presidential Election?
Did Biden win the election fairly and legitimately or not?
Does your position permit "splitting the difference"? How would that work? Are you advocating that we meet in the middle and say Biden won but not legitimately? Or that Trump lost but it wasn't a fair election?
Some positions just don't work like that. OAN won't simply say that Biden is the legitimately elected President. What do you propose is the appropriate "compromise" solution in this case?