The UN also theoretically can step in if a nation does bad things to its own citizens ( like genocide etc). What is being discussed here is Twitter, an America

The UN also theoretically can step in if a nation does bad things to its own citizens ( like genocide etc). What is being discussed here is Twitter, an American company in relation to countries like India, etc. > to spread ideas that the majority finds evil and harmful Who is the majority? And how did twitter find it? If twitter lets a ranking system similar to HN/reddit, and content below a particular ratio is hidden, that might be fine I guess. it would be a mob, I would'nt like it, but atleast, its uniform. > Get your own bullhorn and stop trying to make laws demanding your neighbor lend you his. What does that even mean? Is twitter my neighbour? Do I, a ordinary citizen have similar clout? In a way, I see twitter as a bully (a loud bullhorn) who was terrorizing the neighborhood one after the other. He walks into this one, where there is a stronger bully (with laws that have teeth) and slaps him silly. This bully now cries, and yeah, not getting much sympathy from the folks he bullied.