I don't get it, why would you assume that the article is FUD? The article starts off by saying "I'd like to bust a few myths", and proceeds to (allegedly) do s

I don't get it, why would you assume that the article is FUD? The article starts off by saying "I'd like to bust a few myths", and proceeds to (allegedly) do so. It also deliberately points out that there are good things about the organic farming movement, AND points out that all of the "bad stuff" is done by some but not all farms, both organic and conventional. It does nothing more or less than what it purports to, and I don't see the first hint of FUD. And while you appear desperate to rebut it, the best you can do is "I know anecdotes suck, but here's mine!" The funny thing is, unlike your response screed, the article has no less than 18 references. I'm happy to assume that the reference are cherry-picked to back up the author's points, but even so, it's pretty hard to find a blog post that even manages this. What more could you wish for? What more could you wish for than a piece that wishes to "point out that it's not as black and white as it looks".