4 ms·
But we know where all the planes are, and actively monitor and move them around to avoid collisions. If there are a sufficient large number of satellites would
by kmonsen 5y ago
But we know where all the planes are, and actively monitor and move them around to avoid collisions. If there are a sufficient large number of satellites would there not be some risk of accidental collision with spacecraft taking off?
- shkkmo 5y ago> But we know where all the planes are, and actively monitor and move them around to avoid collisions. This is also true for satellites.
- EveYoung 5y agoA similar monitoring applies to satellites as well. We're not launching spacecrafts and just hope that everything goes well.
- gvb 5y agoWe know where all the satellites are and they are actively tracked by both governments and private citizens. Every satellite is in a very deterministic orbit which requires energy to change (enormous amounts of energy for a significant change) so they don't change their orbit significantly nor often. Ref: https://sos.noaa.gov/catalog/datasets/space-trash-and-satellites/ https://sos.noaa.gov/catalog/datasets/space-trash-and-satell...
- chrisseaton 5y ago> But we know where all the planes are, and actively monitor and move them around to avoid collisions. Do you think they don't know where their satellites are?
- popz41 5y agoNASA & the ESA actively monitors all satellites and actually maintains a database of every little piece of space debris they find (payload fairings, failed satellites, etc). They determine the orbit and track it until it falls back to earth.
- haliskerbas 5y agoThis is a fun site for tracking stuff in space: http://stuffin.space/ http://stuffin.space/
- dehrmann 5y ago> But we know where all the planes are We really don't. We mostly know for commercial flights, but not so much for general aviation. What aviation does is have zones around airports with restricted airspace that is well-controlled.