3 ms·
To some degree, isn't that essentially just "adding one more turtle"? Now instead of space being Euclidean, you're saying space-time is? And effectively if spa
by BoiledCabbage 5y ago
To some degree, isn't that essentially just "adding one more turtle"?
Now instead of space being Euclidean, you're saying space-time is? And effectively if space-time were no longer Euclidean, then the conversion to cycles/sec would use the "alternate pi" of this non-euclidean space time wouldn't it?