3 ms·

It will probably be another typical EU design by committee disaster, like the cookie banner laws.

tux3 5y ago
The cookie laws have good intentions. They say that you don't have to put up a cookie banner, because you only use necessary cookies. Unless you're doing things that require consent, then you gotta ask or you gotta stop doing that.
hhhhhhiirirjff 5y ago
Or x400
mrtksn 5y ago
Better invest in PR then. For some reason people believe that EU is forcing developers to put cookie banners on websites.
- herbst 5y ago
  People should have noticed that these banners usually only show up on websites that heavily track their users. And most of the time they just redirect you away if you don't agree to the tracking. Honestly people just use an adblocker and don't trust weird banners
Barrin92 5y ago
that's not a design disaster, that's a company privacy disaster. The cookie laws just make transparent and explicit the amount of tracking that businesses engage in. The target of your criticism should not be the EU, it should be websites who put stumbling blocks into the user experience because they want to force you to consent to their data gathering. Compliance could be very simple without any cookie banners, just let the user opt-in and turn it off by default.
- bijant 5y ago
  In the best case a cookie banner gives me an opportunity to trust a site owner (not necessarily a company) that they won‘t use cookies to do invasive tracking I didn’t agree to. Oftentimes sites just straight up require consent to „necessary“ cookies in order to use the site at all. In these cases the EU imposed Cookie Banners don’t even give me the option to disable cookie based tracking. In other cases it takes minutes of my time to navigate the cookie banner to get the desired results. Why should I choose such an ineffective solution if there are superior technical solutions to the same problem such as privacy aware browsers or extensions that don’t require user trust in site owners compliance but stop cookie based tracking on a technical level ? The Cookie banner legislation actually did nothing at all for privacy, quite the opposite it made browsing the web in incognito mode much more annoying as you’re constantly forced to close cookie banners before beeing able to consume the actual on-site content. (Googles (coincidental?) Decision to disallow chrome extensions in incognito mode renders relevant anti-cookie-banner extensions useless)

tux3 5y ago

The cookie laws have good intentions. They say that you don't have to put up a cookie banner, because you only use necessary cookies. Unless you're doing things that require consent, then you gotta ask or you gotta stop doing that.

hhhhhhiirirjff 5y ago

Or x400

mrtksn 5y ago

Better invest in PR then. For some reason people believe that EU is forcing developers to put cookie banners on websites.

herbst 5y ago
People should have noticed that these banners usually only show up on websites that heavily track their users. And most of the time they just redirect you away if you don't agree to the tracking. Honestly people just use an adblocker and don't trust weird banners

Barrin92 5y ago

that's not a design disaster, that's a company privacy disaster. The cookie laws just make transparent and explicit the amount of tracking that businesses engage in. The target of your criticism should not be the EU, it should be websites who put stumbling blocks into the user experience because they want to force you to consent to their data gathering. Compliance could be very simple without any cookie banners, just let the user opt-in and turn it off by default.

bijant 5y ago
In the best case a cookie banner gives me an opportunity to trust a site owner (not necessarily a company) that they won‘t use cookies to do invasive tracking I didn’t agree to. Oftentimes sites just straight up require consent to „necessary“ cookies in order to use the site at all. In these cases the EU imposed Cookie Banners don’t even give me the option to disable cookie based tracking. In other cases it takes minutes of my time to navigate the cookie banner to get the desired results. Why should I choose such an ineffective solution if there are superior technical solutions to the same problem such as privacy aware browsers or extensions that don’t require user trust in site owners compliance but stop cookie based tracking on a technical level ? The Cookie banner legislation actually did nothing at all for privacy, quite the opposite it made browsing the web in incognito mode much more annoying as you’re constantly forced to close cookie banners before beeing able to consume the actual on-site content. (Googles (coincidental?) Decision to disallow chrome extensions in incognito mode renders relevant anti-cookie-banner extensions useless)