3 ms·
There is no evidence the subject of the article is a terrorist. The “terrorism” story presented by the government is pretext.
by elliekelly 5y ago
There is no evidence the subject of the article is a terrorist. The “terrorism” story presented by the government is pretext.
- kragen 5y agoOf course there isn't any evidence that he is (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tahir_Hamut_Izgil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tahir_Hamut_Izgil is empty), but aside from the terrorist campaign being conducted by the government against opposition, there is also an active terrorist campaign in Xinjiang being conducted by Uighur dissidents against the Chinese government: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_conflict#Terrorist_groups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_conflict#Terrorist_gr...