4 ms·
Yes, it is. You either need to entirely fork your operation to have it operate entirely within India, or be extremely careful with how you store your data, and
by kyrra 5y ago
Yes, it is. You either need to entirely fork your operation to have it operate entirely within India, or be extremely careful with how you store your data, and store the data only in India, but process it in other data centers without ever having it touched disk. Which I believed means you can never even log the data.
- ntrz 5y agoThe rule[0] says that you can process the data abroad, including storing it on disk temporarily for purposes of processing, as long as it is deleted within 24 hours. So it's not quite as strict as requiring it be kept in memory the whole time without ever writing to disk, but it does sound like you probably couldn't keep detailed logs. [0] https://rbi.org.in/CommonPerson/english/Scripts/FAQs.aspx?Id=2995 https://rbi.org.in/CommonPerson/english/Scripts/FAQs.aspx?Id...
- KineticLensman 5y ago> but it does sound like you probably couldn't keep detailed logs. Or backups.
- toomuchtodo 5y agoBackups for India can be kept in India. It is a big country.
- BitwiseFool 5y agoAs difficult as this will be to implement, I suspect it will be a boon for the Indian IT industry. I suspect MasterCard and others will comply with the new law in due time simply because the Indian market is so vast and full of revenue potential.
- captn3m0 5y agoThe original RBI circular was in 2018[1] with a audit date set for December 2018. That wasn't met as most companies requested for an extension, which the RBI gave multiple times. So yes, it is difficult - but it has been years since MasterCard knew about this. [1]: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=11244&Mode=0 https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=1124...
- passivate 5y agoHow long do you think it will take to do it?