3 ms·
I kinda agree. We also have the mounting pressure for getting unconscious bias out of the hiring process. It would seem if we think people are fired also for bi
by social_quotient 5y ago
I kinda agree. We also have the mounting pressure for getting unconscious bias out of the hiring process. It would seem if we think people are fired also for bias and unfair reasons that the ai would be the likely only way to save the situation.
Seems here with amazon we are quick to suggest humans are the best way but in nearly all other inclusion/diversity posts we are fighting against the humans being faulty.
Interesting problem for sure
- oarsinsync 5y ago> if we think people are fired also for bias and unfair reasons that the ai would be the likely only way to save the situation. This assumes that bias and unfair reasons aren't codified or part of the training set, which we've seen previously, simply isn't true. There's an example of a company using AI to do a first pass on CVs for recruiting throw away female CVs. Another example of a company using AI to identify people in photos identify certain skin tones as being animals instead. AI isn't a magic bullet, simply because it's still coded by humans who make mistakes, conscious or otherwise. Or to put it another way, garbage in, garbage out.