I'd argue that if a process does not have room for you to explain yourself, and ensure that ALL data is taken into consideration by the other side then such pro

I'd argue that if a process does not have room for you to explain yourself, and ensure that ALL data is taken into consideration by the other side then such process is authoritarian and not objective. An algorithm only looks at data it was programmed to look at, which is usually too narrow to be able to be without faults in the real world. There are good reasons why judicial systems have higher instances in them to which you can appeal to if you don't agree with lower instance.