4 ms·

Actually, those who "can't do", generally "can't teach" either. One surefire way to get better at doing something is trying to teach it, in fact. I get what th

Actually, those who "can't do", generally "can't teach" either. One surefire way to get better at doing something is trying to teach it, in fact. I get what the quote is trying to imply, (and why) but it's totally backwards.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
julian_t 5y ago
It always annoys me when I see that quoted. The original idea applied to people like athletes - you do it when you can, but when you're too old to compete, you can still teach. Nothing to do with ability, and in fact, it assumes more ability on the part of the teacher.
- cfjgvjh 5y ago
  From my experience, athletes who were really good at the sport wasn't the greatest teacher; since they kind of intuitively understood how they should conduct their body to do something, they had a real tough time trying to transfer that knowledge to me who has no idea how I should move my body. They often tried to use imaginary that didn't really connect with me. It was far better to be taught by someone who was good but wasn't a natural as a beginner since they seemed to have a better grasp on what kind of struggles normal people had. Obviously this is just anecdotal and probably changes at the Olympics levels and other places where the learner competency and affinity is already high.
- HWR_14 5y ago
  I've tried tutoring people in academic subjects I know really well. I find myself unable to explain what they're doing wrong because I cannot put myself in their shoes. Try teaching algebra or calculus to someone who doesn't get it, and let me know if your skills really help with that.
bitwize 5y ago
Depends on what you're teaching. In engineering circles it's been said that those who can, do; those who can't, become Six Sigma consultants.
- sjg007 5y ago
  Or agile instructors / scrum masters.
  - bitwize 5y ago
    That'd be the SW equivalent, yes.
slightwinder 5y ago
Not really. One can have the knowledge and understand the mechanics of a trait, and is still unable to succedd in this trait. Especially creative fields are guilty of this. Similar is sports. A great coach can still be lousy player. Because at the end for success you need far more than just knowledge.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

julian_t 5y ago

It always annoys me when I see that quoted. The original idea applied to people like athletes - you do it when you can, but when you're too old to compete, you can still teach. Nothing to do with ability, and in fact, it assumes more ability on the part of the teacher.

cfjgvjh 5y ago
From my experience, athletes who were really good at the sport wasn't the greatest teacher; since they kind of intuitively understood how they should conduct their body to do something, they had a real tough time trying to transfer that knowledge to me who has no idea how I should move my body. They often tried to use imaginary that didn't really connect with me. It was far better to be taught by someone who was good but wasn't a natural as a beginner since they seemed to have a better grasp on what kind of struggles normal people had. Obviously this is just anecdotal and probably changes at the Olympics levels and other places where the learner competency and affinity is already high.
HWR_14 5y ago
I've tried tutoring people in academic subjects I know really well. I find myself unable to explain what they're doing wrong because I cannot put myself in their shoes. Try teaching algebra or calculus to someone who doesn't get it, and let me know if your skills really help with that.

bitwize 5y ago

Depends on what you're teaching. In engineering circles it's been said that those who can, do; those who can't, become Six Sigma consultants.

sjg007 5y ago
Or agile instructors / scrum masters.
- bitwize 5y ago
  That'd be the SW equivalent, yes.

slightwinder 5y ago

Not really. One can have the knowledge and understand the mechanics of a trait, and is still unable to succedd in this trait. Especially creative fields are guilty of this. Similar is sports. A great coach can still be lousy player. Because at the end for success you need far more than just knowledge.