3 ms·
If you're editing very high bitrate or high resolution video - or both. 16G is perfectly adequate for 1080p video around 30MB/s, which most people's video will
by HelixEndeavor 5y ago
If you're editing very high bitrate or high resolution video - or both. 16G is perfectly adequate for 1080p video around 30MB/s, which most people's video will be.
- paxys 5y agoConsidering even the cheapest smartphones today record in 4K, and some go up to 60 fps (including iPhone), most people are definitely not editing 1080p videos on their macbooks.
- HelixEndeavor 5y agoI have a phone capable of 4K60, and I never use it, unless my goal is to fill up my phone's storage as quickly as possible. And I've seen reports that the M1 can handle RED RAW 4K footage with just 8G of RAM, and only stutters on 8K. Snazzy Labs even claims that it actually scrubs the timeline smoother than this $10,000 Mac Pro ever did, the only failing is 50% longer render times: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY-S9EuJ5Xs&t=474s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY-S9EuJ5Xs&t=474s So this once again proves that the M1 defies our standard expectations and measurements of computer processing power.