3 ms·
These responses are correct. I'll add: 3) yes I read it. It's an example Einstein created, so possibly worth responding to the points made there rather than at
by nl 5y ago
These responses are correct.
I'll add: 3) yes I read it. It's an example Einstein created, so possibly worth responding to the points made there rather than attacking me for "not reading it".
- drran 5y agoIf you read it and understood it, can you show us how to apply this formula to the warp drive, please? I cannot ask Einstein, obviously.
- nl 5y agoIt exactly applies to a warp drive. Just saying "warp drive" doesn't have magical qualities - it's exactly what Einstein was talking about. So you put in the numbers in the same way as that numerical example on Wikipedia, and it shows the same thing. Edit: the only exception I can think of is if causality can be reversed.