2 ms·
I disagree. Vale Tudo came before MMA and had the most effective value for actual combat situations. - No rounds - No hand wraps and gloves - No resets to s
by jollofricepeas 5y ago
I disagree.
Vale Tudo came before MMA and had the most effective value for actual combat situations.
- No rounds
- No hand wraps and gloves
- No resets to standing for “non-action”
- Attacks to prone opponents
The problem is that there’s a big gap between “sports martial arts” rules and “self defense.”
Sport BJJ is just as bad as karate for self-defense because there’s lot of new movements that just don’t make sense when you’re attacked at a frat house or walking home late.
Old school BJJ grappling (Carlson Gracie) with a focus on self defense is literally the best thing for smaller people, women & children because there’s a focus on:
- minimizing damage to yourself
- escaping and reversing compromising positions
- having MULTIPLE options to either kill, break a bone or put your attacker to sleep
- (if needed) striking with elbows and knees.
- coffee_addict 5y ago> The problem is that there’s a big gap between “sports martial arts” rules and “self defense.” The "sport" aspect is the most important part for becoming an effective fighter. And being an effective fighter is paramount for self-defense situations. The "sport vs self-defense" argument is a false dichotomy anyways. If my "sport" consists of me wrestling resisting humans to the ground, controlling all of their limbs, and potentially putting them to sleep, then my "sport" is an extremely effective form of self-defense.