3 ms·
You don't understand. The article mentions Koons' case only because it is so unusual. Anyone who understands art typically agrees that Koons should have won. In
by bluekeybox 15y ago
You don't understand. The article mentions Koons' case only because it is so unusual. Anyone who understands art typically agrees that Koons should have won. In fact, this case could be used as a way to gauge someone's grasp of what contemporary art is.