3 ms·
>We are entering dark times in how people can control us by how we can spend our money Who said bitcoin is currency? It doesn't even meeting definitional requi
by scrubs 5y ago
>We are entering dark times in how people can control us by how we can spend our money
Who said bitcoin is currency? It doesn't even meeting definitional requirements for currency. Moreover, if bitcoin and its crypto advocates were just OK with letting it run side by side with fiat currencies that'd be one thing. But the perhaps not express still implicit goal of crypto is to replace fiat currency which necessarily puts it into conflict with the Gov. whether in the east or west. There's an anarchist theme there. So how can it really be surprising there's push back? Let's not forget spending fiat currency --- well, at least in the west (the good side) --- has no overlord limits other than criminal you think exist.
- autokad 5y agoI didnt say it was a currency, I said the powers that be may prevent us from using our currency to buy / transact with it or what ever they find socially unacceptable.
- scrubs 5y agohttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-14/dogecoin-doge-creator-jackson-palmer-returns-to-twitter-to-blast-crypto https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-14/dogecoin-... The key quote is here: https://ibb.co/Sm8LW0x https://ibb.co/Sm8LW0x Asked and answered + 1.
- scrubs 5y agoI said Bitcoin wasn't a currency. You said bitcoin isn't a currency too. So that's it then. The only thing really left on the table is fiat currency which, as I already said, isn't constrained by (insert adjective here e.g. deep-state) overlords except for criminal acts at least in west. Well, another problem sorted out!