12 ms·
No greed here. Apple is making this so the argument that they get money for lightning cables is irrelevant. The phone uses lightning. It would be weird if the b
by Tagbert 5y ago
No greed here. Apple is making this so the argument that they get money for lightning cables is irrelevant. The phone uses lightning. It would be weird if the battery pack used something else.
You can make an argument that Apple should switch their phones to USB-C but they seem to be heading toward a cable-less solution instead. If they were to change to USB-C tons of people would scream that Apple were doing this just to sell new cables. That is exactly what happened when they switched from the 30-pin connector to lightning. I would like to see them switch on the Pro model phones, at least. That market is likely more ready to switch.
- arihant 5y agoApple makes good money from MFi program, of which lightning connector seems to be a vital cog. The day they shift to USB-C manufacturers will stop paying them for lightning accessories.
- EarthLaunch 5y agoMoving to cable-less is a good idea, but these chargers and batteries themselves still need to be plugged into something. I guess that should be USB-C, but USB-C confuses people. Perhaps Apple should move to some kind of solid-state approach like docks built for certain situations (home, travel, car). Abstracting away "plugging in" as much as possible.