4 ms·
It means the browser is in control of the header, and not some script. From https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8942 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html
by banana_giraffe 5y ago
It means the browser is in control of the header, and not some script. From https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8942 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8942 :
Authors of new Client Hints are advised to carefully consider whether
they need to be able to be added by client-side content (e.g.,
scripts) or whether the Client Hints need to be exclusively set by
the user agent. In the latter case, the Sec- prefix on the header
field name has the effect of preventing scripts and other application
content from setting them in user agents. Using the "Sec-" prefix
signals to servers that the user agent -- and not application content
-- generated the values. See [FETCH] for more information.
As near as I can tell, the bit they're talking about in the Fetch standard is just this:
These are forbidden so the user agent remains in full control over them.
Names starting with `Sec-` are reserved to allow new headers to be minted
that are safe from APIs using fetch that allow control over headers by
developers, such as XMLHttpRequest.
- sdflhasjd 5y agoDoes it stand for something? Why the letters 'Sec'?
- banana_giraffe 5y agoI don't think I've ever seen it called out, but I always assumed it's "Secure" in the sense it hasn't been modified by a script. But that's 100% a guess on my part.
- herpderperator 5y agoGreat, so now we have the HttpOnly flag for cookies which differs from the Secure flag for cookies, while the Secure in the Sec headers has the same meaning as HttpOnly.
- billyhoffman 5y agoAnd we have SameSite in Cookies, and Allow-Origin in headers!