3 ms·
This wikipedia article has nothing to do with your vague assertions above, except for the bit that directly contradicts you: "Though he claimed fair use and pa
by nate_meurer 15y ago
This wikipedia article has nothing to do with your vague assertions above, except for the bit that directly contradicts you: "Though he claimed fair use and parody in his defense, Koons lost the case, partially due to the tremendous success he had as an artist."
- bluekeybox 15y agoYou don't understand. The article mentions Koons' case only because it is so unusual. Anyone who understands art typically agrees that Koons should have won. In fact, this case could be used as a way to gauge someone's grasp of what contemporary art is.