The supposed blanked "training ML is fair use, and the output of ML is not a derivative work" precedent is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_In

The supposed blanked "training ML is fair use, and the output of ML is not a derivative work" precedent is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc.#Second_Circuit_appeal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,... Maybe I can't read, but it's just not there. This ruling giving precedent to train generative ML systems with any source material seems to be nothing more than a shared fiction entertained by the ML industry.