8 ms·
Yeah, further we should've stopped making planes or smartphones early on, too since only the rich could afford them.
by Tenoke 5y ago
Yeah, further we should've stopped making planes or smartphones early on, too since only the rich could afford them.
- qayxc 5y agoI think you are missing an important distinction here: when the first planes got commercialised, even the first passenger flights weren't just amusement rides. They were expensive, sure, but they served a legit purpose. The same is true to an even greater degree for mobile phones. Joy rides to the edge of space however are neither new (Dennis Tito went all the way to the ISS back in 2001 and jet planes to the upper stratosphere could be booked for decades as well) nor in any way pushing progress. Nonsense like this doesn't have to be stopped - everyone's free to spend their money however they wish - it's the glorification of the ultra-rich and their playthings (especially in the face of pending global ecological and social collapse) that's is being criticized.
- dwaltrip 5y agoBrandson’s flights, once available to the public, will cost ~$200k, not $20m like flights to the ISS have costed in the past. A 100x decrease in cost is a pretty meaningful change. What is your basis for claiming that these developments will have no useful secondary or tertiary spillover effects for society? Many space developments have created new technologies that are useful back on the surface.