4 ms·
No but you may want to try rclone. Not exactly lightweight but it’s very easy to use and configure with a variety of storage services.
by yepthatsreality 5y ago
No but you may want to try rclone. Not exactly lightweight but it’s very easy to use and configure with a variety of storage services.
- karmakaze 5y agoThanks, this is the only answer that seems to understand what I want. Most of the other comments say sync != backup, but depending on your (or my) use case either could work just fine. rsync is good enough for me so rclone may be too. Hopefully I don't run into any OS/filesystem difference problems, e.g. case-insensitivity, special chars, or path lengths.
- yepthatsreality 5y agoFYI, rclone is built on top of rsync. So you’ll have a good understanding of how it works underneath. Think of it as rsync + remote storage and service mounting tool. The nicest part about rclone IMO, is the plethora of services it can mount, so if you have compatibility issues (which you shouldn’t) then you could choose another service.