More than likely, the document was written by the prosecutors office. The procedure as I understand it is: * Prosecutor assembles evidence, writes indictment.

More than likely, the document was written by the prosecutors office. The procedure as I understand it is: * Prosecutor assembles evidence, writes indictment. * Prosecutor presents evidence to Grand Jury. This may include witnesses or documents. * Grand Jury votes on if there is enough there to approve indictment If they've got a computer crimes division, then they're going to have hacker types in the prosecutor's office to do this stuff and get the details right. The indictment is going to be the most slam dunk part of the evidence that there is, as it's written by the prosecutor and there's no counter to it. If it doesn't look airtight, then it's probably a very weak case. Though, looking at it here, It's not looking very good for aaronsw. The combination of mac address spoofing and a locked wiring cabinet show physical and electronic security that was bypassed, repeatedly. That's easy to explain to a jury.