4 ms·
> Facebook locking down their stuff earlier than that and then again when they had the perfect excuse because of HN and the media’s relentless attacking of FB f
by sangnoir 5y ago
> Facebook locking down their stuff earlier than that and then again when they had the perfect excuse because of HN and the media’s relentless attacking of FB for Cambridge Analytica
Facebook started locking their stuff way before Cambridge Analytica - I'd say by 5-8 years. Even then, Fb acted like an open platform for games and quizzes, but locked down its social-graph while siphoning Google's (via one-way Messenger-GTalk/XMPP interop). That marked a turning point for Google's attitude towards openness as well, since open vs. closed systems exhibit something similar to the paradox of tolerance: closed systems will take advantage of open systems and smother them out of existence.
- skinnymuch 5y agoI did say FB was locking things down before. Things weren’t fully locked down for me personally until Cambridge Analytica. That’s when the graph became completely useless. At least it had a bit of utility before. For Google. That may have been a turning point. But Google’s actions by and large are their own. No one does their repeated bad behavior because of a few incidents with FB or other big players. Even more, I have no doubt Google would’ve ended up close enough to where they are now even without FBM’s interoperability shenanigans. On the other hand, FB had no reason to lock things down the way they did after Cambridge as it was already pretty much locked down. That was a perfect excuse to do something in their interest while garnering praise from everyone. It’s easy to blame FB for everything. They are the most blamed tech company for years now. Not as nice when society is complicit with one of their lockdown times though.