4 ms·
Facts cannot be copyrighted, but the content describing the facts is. I have no issue with that but, what if Google deployed some Copilot-like technology to ge
by pantulis 5y ago
Facts cannot be copyrighted, but the content describing the facts is. I have no issue with that but, what if Google deployed some Copilot-like technology to generate its own news feed content?
- keithnoizu 5y agoprint some spoof news articles periodically and sue them when they duplicate your "parody content" like the yellow books used to do to prevent duplication of phone numbers.
- yodelshady 5y ago> what if Google deployed some Copilot-like technology to generate its own news feed content? Would depend on its feed, surely. Taking the fast-but-insane firehose of Twitter and turning it into an accurate and sensible report is value-adding and fair use, prepending a copied article with "<X> reports..." isn't. Same as creative work really, so I suppose we'll see the same shenanigans.
- josefx 5y agocopilot has already ended up reproducing longer snippets of its input perfectly, at least for code that appeared multiple times in its training set. Given that a lot of news papers and sites source some of their articles from the same agencies they would probably end up repeating quite a bit of their input word for word.