So then why doesn't Google just say look less like a scam? Why don't they give their reasoning? Why don't they just provide that reasoning? Regardless, I still

So then why doesn't Google just say look less like a scam? Why don't they give their reasoning? Why don't they just provide that reasoning? Regardless, I still find your position kind of crazy. Basically you're saying (honestly totally subjectively without any real rational basis) that this _looks_ like a scam (opinion), therefore it's more likely to be a scam and therefore it should be banned. So if the user responds and demonstrates that it _isn't_ a scam, then you why the hell not allow it to work again? Personally I think Google should be legally required to provide this reasoning and to reinstate it if they are initially incorrect in their conclusion that it's a scam. I'm kind of amazed that that would even be required since it's basic human decency that if Google is incorrect, they fix their mistake. But well money is more attractive than morals and decency.