4 ms·
The title of this article is stupid- and leads to the mixups you are talking about. But if you read the article, your quoted statement is not an equivocation,
by gregwebs 18y ago
The title of this article is stupid- and leads to the mixups you are talking about. But if you read the article, your quoted statement is not an equivocation, it is the specific paradox the scientists propose.
Free will does not mean unpredictability, but if unpredictability is a consequence of free will, and there is no unpredictability, then we can say that free will does not exist.
- anamax 18y agoThere is unpredictability, but there are also things that are unpredictable that don't have free will. Consider three armed pendulum.
- dmfdmf 18y agoUnpredictability of what is the consquence of FW?
- dmfdmf 18y agoI hardly think FW needs an existence/non-existence proof because without it you can't have knowledge, concepts, language, morality, math, science nor HN discussions!