Well the problem that needs to be solved is obviously copyright law, as does the article indicate too. It couldn't be clearer that people are not happy with the

Well the problem that needs to be solved is obviously copyright law, as does the article indicate too. It couldn't be clearer that people are not happy with the current status quo, for example regarding redistribution of digital goods. How we as a society are going to handle that is not a solved issue. I felt the need to point out, that simply stating "copyright is in itself unnatural, let's just not think about it or drop it" is preposterous and uses an arbitrary definition of "natural" and furthermore draws arbitrary conclusions on that definition. (natural = good) We clearly need to have some kind of protection of ideas, because they clearly have value. But mostly because people themselves value them.