How about also supporting the <URL:http://google.com/> http://google.com/> syntax that the RFCs use? It would let us submit the more tricky ones. It was inven

How about also supporting the <URL:http://google.com/> http://google.com/> syntax that the RFCs use? It would let us submit the more tricky ones. It was invented because of the problem you're having; it's ambiguous whether the trailing dot is part of the URL or not.