3 ms·
I'm pretty sure this is a logical fallacy. In the case of medications it's actually a fairly common situation where a patient has a terminal illness that there
by edude03 5y ago
I'm pretty sure this is a logical fallacy. In the case of medications it's actually a fairly common situation where a patient has a terminal illness that there is no treatment available for, but you can get it on "the blackmarket" and in that case, it's either die for sure, or maybe not die, and in that case having a beta makes sense - it ensures you're atleast getting the thing you think you're getting.
To me autonomous vehicles are similar - the people who have access to them know they're not perfect, but they're willing to spend the money because they think it's better than the alternative
- mritun 5y agoBetter than the `alternative` ?... which is drive the car like everyone else? Why do Tesla drivers get the privilege to beta-test their cars on public road with everyone else around and potentially in their kill-zone?
- edude03 5y agoWhy does anyone get to drive on public roads? This seems to be what this entire thread is about. Are you against Tesla owners in particular? I can hit and kill someone in any car with or without driver assist technologies. Are you worried that it's more likely that I will kill someone while using technology that is invented to make that less likely?