3 ms·
I feel bad for the author, but I am perfectly fine with a few false positives if it means more scams are blocked. I'd even be okay if the number of false positi
by ydlr 5y ago
I feel bad for the author, but I am perfectly fine with a few false positives if it means more scams are blocked. I'd even be okay if the number of false positives is higher than the actual scams blocked if it meant very very few scams make it through the filters.
I think Google should be liable for scams on its network. They should either:
1. Figure out a way to better automate scam filtering,
2. Hire a massive number of people to review each ad, or
3. Downsize their business until they can manage it responsibly.
Google is not entitled to their scale. If they cannot responsibly run a business at its current size, they should be forced to downsize until they can.