> if humans were held to the standards machines are, we wouldn't let them drive. That's not how it even works though. When people crash or drive drunk there is

> if humans were held to the standards machines are, we wouldn't let them drive. That's not how it even works though. When people crash or drive drunk there is a system to hand out consequences. What do you do when a Tesla drives into a monorail pole and causes millions in damage if the structural integrity is compromised? >statistically, it killed people at the same rate as humans You can't tell me a car that's at best an average not-murderer is a good sell. There are also so many ways to self-determine your risk while driving or traveling in general. A clear example is seat belts. Less than 10% of people in the US don't wear seat belts but a full 47% of the people that died in car accidents were not wearing one. [1] 1 - https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/seat-belts https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/seat-belts