3 ms·
Better response times than other websites I browse… maybe they should upgrade to Casios.
by andrewmcwatters 5y ago
Better response times than other websites I browse… maybe they should upgrade to Casios.
- asmos7 5y agodown for me.
- laurent92 5y agoI wonder whether it would be fast if it ran some ancient web technology, such as CGI, .Net frameworks for the web or Filemaker web.
- munk-a 5y agoI strongly suspect the webpage is entirely static and trying to run any sort of modern serverside framework would make it wail in protest - some simple dynamic elements using the native script might be doable though. It'd be neat to see if they could get a page counter up - just a dumb one that blindly increments the counter whenever any visit occurs.
- arkitaip 5y agoMaybe we should all skip cloud platfoms and CDNs and buy a bunch of Casios instead.
- andrewmcwatters 5y agoHow many Casios can you fit in a U1 rack?
- Johnny555 5y agoThe calculator's dimensions are: 21.3 x 87.5 x 180.5mm A 1U rack comes in various depths, let's assume 1m (1000mm), and the width between rails is about 450mm. 1U is around 44mm in height. So in 1U, you could stack them 2 high, 5 wide, and 5 deep (this leaves a little wiggle room for cables and such), or 50 per 1U, or 2100 in a 42U full rack.
- andrewmcwatters 5y agoHah! That’s production ready if you ask me.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- fsiefken 5y agowe should all upgrade to gemini on casios, not sure if the processor is powerful enough to run the opentls encryption. perhaps a beowulf cluster can be made