I agree nearly everything from the site looks shady. But I'm not convinced that being opaque about why something was rejected is what's preventing scammers from

I agree nearly everything from the site looks shady. But I'm not convinced that being opaque about why something was rejected is what's preventing scammers from making stuff that doesn't look like a scam. Scams look like trash because the effort to reward has to match. If you're gonna spend hours and hours perfecting some scam site, you might as well just provide the service. Obviously there are some tradeoffs but hell, even a generic link to a user support group would prevent small, inexperienced people from getting crushed by the cogs like this.