2 ms·
I personally think the way the ad was written it seems to suggest anonymous transactions (not the case of course), but I also would look at this statement: "we
by bdcravens 5y ago
I personally think the way the ad was written it seems to suggest anonymous transactions (not the case of course), but I also would look at this statement:
"we do not impersonate other brands"
The domain is safeapps.io. Not only does this name seem very similar to other applications, some of which are on the Google Play (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.hopehealing.safeapp&hl=en_US&gl=US https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.hopehealin...), a service provider (https://safemoney.com/ https://safemoney.com/) and even a US military domain (https://safe.apps.mil/ https://safe.apps.mil/). Additionally, on the page the word "safe" doesn't even show up, suggesting the domain name is a squat. I don't believe that it's a squat, but the author is jumping to some big conclusions without looking at some potential causes.
- grayhatter 5y agoYou're right, of course... but it would be nice if they didn't have to make assumptions, or jump to these conclusions though wouldn't it?
- armoredkitten 5y agoBad design, but if you hold your mouse over the "[] money" logo at the top, the word "safe" appears. I don't really understand why someone would choose to create a design that actively hides their own branding...but the word is there.
- bdcravens 5y agoYeah, I didn't see that. I can't imagine what that does for accessibility.