8 ms·
The thing is, that returning to your notes is the least important part of taking notes. What writing notes longhand does is do a better job of encoding what you
by dhosek 5y ago
The thing is, that returning to your notes is the least important part of taking notes. What writing notes longhand does is do a better job of encoding what you're taking notes about into your long-term memory.
Anecdata: As part of an ongoing project,¹ I spent about two years teaching myself Biblical Greek. As part of this project, I ended up filling a couple notebooks with handwritten notes—writing out tables of conjugations for every verb that was taught, handwriting translations to and from Greek, etc. What I found was that even though I never actually went back to the previous notes, I had good recall of the information that I practiced in this fashion. I think (but what do I know?) that part of it was the spatial component to the note-taking. I can't find stuff in code that I've written without searching,² but I could go back to my handwritten notes from learning Greek (2017–2019) and find, say, what I had written about the aorist passive without much difficulty.³
---
1. https://www.dahosek.com/category/dewey-decimal-project/ https://www.dahosek.com/category/dewey-decimal-project/
2. You might think, “big deal—then search” but what if the search is not by some thing easily turned into text but rather some concept which I don't remember exactly what I typed to do it, or the searchable thing ends up being some bit of text that recurs so frequently that the search is effectively useless. I have a much easier time finding things I've read on paper from my personal library of around 1200 printed books than I do finding something I've read online even with the fast searching capabilities of the internet (although I will admit that it's a lot easier to find disposable writing again online than in print).
3. That spatial context helps in other ways too—I can find things from grad school notes (2002–6) pretty easily as well and there was one time in 1999 that I pulled up a quote from a book that I'd read in 1992 (which had no index) in just a couple minutes thanks to my memory of roughly where in the book and where on a page spread the passage appeared.⁴
4. Yes, I know that, especially with that last anecdote that I'm getting into stuff that's likely well outside the norm, but the basic point that spatial context helps with memory is something that's well-studied and documented. We don't get that with typing on a screen.
- aspyct 5y agoI disagree. Returning to my notes is the most important thing I do. I just don't have enough space in my working memory for all the content we go through per day, all the different topics. It's fine if you handle a thing or two, but a totally different topic if you're jumping around meeting after meeting.
- yodelshady 5y agoThat sounds fine, but almost by definition not the subject matter of "learning". I'd expect if you're at the meeting, you've probably learnt something of value. Otherwise I'd just invite the notebook.
- makeitdouble 5y agoYou seem to be heavily focusing on your own memory and how taking the notes impacts you, when others (me at least) need notes mostly for future reference. I’m not trying to remember in 20 years what order I need to deploy code. I won’t care in two weeks about my TODO of the week. I don’t even _want_ to be aware of the log extracts and where they are stored in the folders and what we discussed about them, hopefully nothing happens and we can all forget. Note taking as an adult is fundamentally different to me from the note taking I did as a kid who was supposed to pass tests with nothing more than a pen on the table.