"Warns" of threats is a great title, as that is all he does. He's a great CEO. Has no outspoken opinion about anything yet maximizes financial results. It's wh

"Warns" of threats is a great title, as that is all he does. He's a great CEO. Has no outspoken opinion about anything yet maximizes financial results. It's what Google needs at this phase of its life cycle. The article dares to even call him an idealist. How so? He's too afraid to even directly mention the China issue, let alone take any responsibility for it. If you're too afraid to concretely even mention a human rights issue, how are you an idealist? When mildly pressed for their tax misbehavior, the comeback is that they no longer use the double dutch construction. An idealist would apologize for even ever using it, and pay back what you dodged. Instead, we're supposed to be happy that they pay some bare minimum now, which...get this...is more than most companies. How generous. An idealist has principles, stands for something, and will defend doing the right thing at any and all costs. He's the opposite of an idealist.