2 ms·
Yes, however for this specific situation `replace()` is not an iterator adapter but a method of `str` which returns a newly allocated `String`. In practice, the
by mastax 5y ago
Yes, however for this specific situation `replace()` is not an iterator adapter but a method of `str` which returns a newly allocated `String`. In practice, the compiler does not do something smarter than that: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/z573Mvjzz https://rust.godbolt.org/z/z573Mvjzz
- rtoway 5y agoAh you are right about that. Yes, it would be a nice place to avoid an allocation